Did Bathsheba Seduce David?

Did Bathsheba purposefully seek to seduce David when bathing? Some books say Bathsheba “intended” to be seen by the king, presumably to seduce David and get closer to the seat of power. But I think this is misreading Scripture. The Bible portrays Bathsheba as an honorable woman of respectable character.

Here are three things about Bathsheba we can be fairly certain about in light of the honor-shame cultural dynamics. These are not facts, but reasonable deductions from the social context.
 

    • Bathsheba was socially prominent. Bathsheba gets introduced as “the daughter of Eliam, the wife of Uriah the Hittite” (2 Sam 11:3). Both her father and her husband were on David’s Top 30 list of elite warriors (2 Sam 23), thus would have enjoyed renown and honor. Bathsheba herself would have inherited such prominence via birth and then marriage. She came from a distinguished family, and been expected to carry herself accordingly. Bathsheba would have most likely acted to retain her family’s social prominence.
    • Bathsheba was Torah observant. Bathsheba was not bathing to seduce David, but to observe OT purity regulations. Let’s reason backwards: Bathsheba got pregnant, so that means she was ovulating at the time. Ovulation happens 1 week after menstruation stops. Therefore, Bathsheba was bathing one week after her bleeding, precisely when Jewish law required ritual bathing for a woman’s bleeding (Lev 15:18-30). The story even says, “Now she had been purifying herself from her uncleanness.” (2 Sam 11:4, ESV). That detail describes the purposes of Bathsheba’s cleansing (and alerts astute readers to an impeding problem, as the time of ritual bathing is when babies are made!) Bathsheba’s bath was likely the ritual bathing of a Torah observant lady, and not a Hollywood-style seduction scene. The text does not say she was bathing naked; she may well have been clothed and washing with a bowl.
    • Bathsheba was a teenager. Considering she was old enough to be married yet still without children, Bathsheba was likely 16-19 years old in the story. In collectivistic cultures prizing children, that phase of “married-without-kids” usually lasts no more than 12 months. Nathan’s reference to her as a “little ewe lamb” (2 Sam 12:3) collaborates this deduction.

Not being told otherwise, the reader could reasonably assume a Torah-observant teenager from a prominent family would behave as socially expected—with modesty and humility, with a healthy sense of shame. Bathsheba would have hardly been pursuing David. Rather, as a young female she would have been unsure how to resist the King. The significant power distance between David and Bathsheba likely limited her ability to refuse the superior.

Considering the social realities in 1 Samuel 11 it is most plausible she was not seeking an extramarital relationship with David. While the text is admittedly silent in that chapter, the next chapter is rather clear on this matter.  When Nathan confronts David, there is zero mention of Bathsheba’s fault. All fingers point squarely at David–“the thing David did displeased the Lord” (2 Sam 11:27).

Then the strongest case for her upright character is the rest of the story–the latter biblical testimony where she is repeatedly portrayed as an honorable person.

Restoring Bathsheba’s Honor

By the end of this story in 2 Sam 11, Bathsheba has endured 3 significant loses within one year; she lost her body, her husband, and her firstborn son. Those are significant for any person, but especially for a young lady in a collectivistic context. She would have been devastated by the grief, as well as the shame of the circumstances. Nevertheless, God sovereignly redeems her.

After this incident with David and Bathsheba, the book of 2 Samuel narrates David’s demise and recounts Bathsheba’s steady exaltation. Many years later as David is dying, Bathsheba acts nobly (at the request of Nathan) to ensure Solomon inherits the throne, as was promised (1 Kings 2:10-12).

Then in a later incident, her royal son Solomon “had a throne brought for the king’s mother, and she sat down at his right hand” (1 Kings 2:19). Bathsheba is in a position of power and honor. From a young girl with nothing, she has become the Queen Mother sitting on a throne at the right hand the king, her son.

Israel thrives under the leadership of Solomon, who wrote three wisdom books (Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and the Songs) that shed further light on Bathsheba. Songs mentions his mother fondly: that she crowned him with a wedding crown (Song 3:11), and that she used to teach him (Song 8:2). In Proverbs, Solomon respected the teaching of his mother (Prov. 1:8-9; 6:20; cf. Prov. 31:1ff). The terms mother is used 15 times in Proverbs with the sense that mothers deserve respect and should be spared the dishonor and grief caused by foolish children. While proverbs are general statements, Solomon personally had his own mother in mind when making those positive comments. And while Solomon’s wisdom was clearly supernatural, such wisdom would have been acquired through family, such as his mother Bathsheba. And when combined with a reference in Jesus’ genealogy (Mt 1:6), the Bible portrays Bathsheba as a respectable and honorable woman in these variety of ways.

The Point

The prominence and honor of Bathsheba in the rest of the Bible is the clearest indication Bathsheba did not sin against God by pursuing David. This aligns with a prominent literary-theological motif in 1-2 Samuel—“Those who honor me I will honor, and those who despise me shall be treated with contempt” (1 Sam 2:30). Because she honored God, God honors her (unlike David whose status spirals down after this incident because he despised God).


Special thanks to Marg Mowczko for her insightful post “A Sympathetic Look at Bathsheba.” 

 

resources for Majority World ministry

Posted in OT, Theology, Uncategorized Tagged with: , , , ,
10 comments on “Did Bathsheba Seduce David?
  1. Irene Hatton says:

    You need to do your research………..ritual cleansing took place in a mikvah and the woman immersed herself 3 times under the water, making sure every orifice of her body was open. She would have been naked. The chances that she would have had her own mikvah is slim. Only the very rich had mikvah in their home and it is a covered area where you go down seven steps, immerse 3 x and then come back up 7 steps. Ritual immersion was done after the period ends. It could not be done with a bowl of water…………at the southern steps of the temple mount there are 48 mikvaot that have been discovered. There is also one found in the “Burnt House” and others down at Qumran, used by the Essenes. At this period of history, I’m not sure what has been found as this was quite awhile before the first century. Women could have gone to a flowing stream or river of fresh water to be immersed at this time. That was quite acceptable in Jewish law at that time……..she was probably just bathing but probably not out in the open. Remember, the king’s palace was above, looking down on all the roof tops of the city of David. She could have been washing her hair, even……..anyway, why is this so important? Why do we dwell on the wrong things?

    • HonorShame says:

      Thanks for your kind insights about ritual cleansing in second-temple period Judaism. I just wonder if anything changed in the 900 years between Bathsheba and then?

      • Irene Hatton says:

        It is important to remember that once these laws were written and codified, they were adhered to carefully. When reading instructions for ritual cleansing, you need to read the whole chapter called “Mikvaot”………it has specific info in it. A mikveh was usually dug out of the ground, sometimes rock, etc. The walls inside were plastered. They had walls and steps and a ceiling. They were not out in the open, even in David’s time. They had to hold a great deal of water: 40 seahs (575 liters) of living water at a minimum. From what I have read there were mikvaot during David’s time period but not as many of them have been found as during the Second temple period. Ritual immersion was a conscious, intentional spiritual act…….not regular bathing. They had to be clean before they ever went into the mikveh. Very interesting to me………..thanks for your reply!

  2. Marg Mowczko says:

    Thanks so much for the mention.

    I still love and read your blog, even though I haven’t commented for a while.

  3. Obarido Thompson OKOCHI says:

    Very splendid information and interaction here!

  4. Gil Kamps says:

    When you read through the genealogy list in Mt. 1, you find the NAMES of Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and virgin Mary. But Bathseba is referred to “Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife.”
    Her name is left out. Why? Probably because she did not act in faith, as the other 4 women in Mt. 1 did.
    The point: David is 100% guilty for his sin. Bathseba is guilty of not calling out for help or confronting David like Joseph did, “How can I do such a thing and sin ag’t God?” (Gen 39:9)

    • HonorShame says:

      Interesting observation. I would say that is a possibility, but not sure if that reasoning is “probable,” esp since Mt 1 is silent as to reason for such wording and 2 Sam 12 doesn’t mention that idea…at least in my readings.

    • Dave says:

      Deut 22:22 gives clear instructions regarding the prescribed penalty for the adultery of both David and Bathsheba. The following verses (through v. 27) show scenarios for urban vs. rural situations which include the test of whether the girl cried out for help. Silence is considered to be assent. However, the girl is mercifully assumed to have cried out if the adultery happened outside the city.

  5. Susan Flores says:

    I believe that Bathsheba gave in to David’s advances. If you stop and think about, Bathsheba ‘s husband was a warrior. I have a feeling that he was a warrior first and husband second. When David had Uriah removed from the war to go home for a few days, what did Uriah do?? He slept at the palace gate instead of going home to be with his wife. Something tells me Uriah wasn’t taking care of business at home. I believe Bathsheba was a very lonely married woman . Not a good combination. I believe she was wooed by David’s handsome looks and succumbed to temptation. Just my opinion….

    • Brian says:

      It seems unlikely that Uriah is ignorant of what David has done and what he is trying to accomplish by calling him home. Rumours must have been circulating around Jerusalem about David and Bathsheba, and could easily have reached the Israelite army which had besieged Rabbah. Uriah not only refuses to go to his house and sleep with his wife, he sleeps at the doorway of the king’s house, in the midst of his servants. He has witnesses any child borne by his wife during this time is not his child. It is clear Uriah understands that David wants him to have sex with his wife, and he refuses, even when the king virtually orders him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*